?

Log in

Inside the Head of Jace [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
jacedraccus

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

BIC... for Her [Aug. 28th, 2012|08:47 pm]
jacedraccus
By now, you've probably seen that BIC, for some surely mind-boggling reason, decided it needed to market pens to women. So now we have pens 'shaped for a woman's hand', 'available in pink and purple'.

Um. Right. On the other hand, those ARE my sister's favourite colours, so at least she will be happy.

The best part of it all, however, are the reviews. Comedy genius. It must be seen to be believed.

So naturally I decided to try my hand at it. Unfortunately, you need to have purchased something from Amazon, and it needs to have been more than two days ago. Interesting thing is, you do not need to purchase a product to review it. I'm not sure of the logic there.

Anyways, here's my contribution.Collapse )
LinkLeave a comment

In which I express something that bugs me [Oct. 2nd, 2011|12:44 am]
jacedraccus
So I've been pondering lately, and finally decided to express it.

Be warned, I've probably said something stupid or offensive here. I also swear a bit.
Here goes...Collapse )
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Review: Shades of Milk and Honey [Jul. 30th, 2011|11:49 pm]
jacedraccus
Shades of Milk and Honey
Mary Robinette Kowal

I'll start by saying that I'm not sure I would have found this book if not for Writing Excuses. I don't generally read 'romance' books, I don't have a particular passion for Regency era (though I do generally enjoy it), and I've never read the works of Jane Austen (the most common comparison). All up, it's not necessarily a book I would have hunted for on my own. Then again, these days I have been on the lookout for anything that sounds 'different', so if I'd seen it in the store I might have picked it up anyway.

As it is, I became aware of this book when Mary Robinette Kowal guest-starred on Writing Excuses. She talked about her book, among other things, and it sounded interesting. So I checked out 'For Want of a Nail', her Hugo-nominated story. And, when the book was released here in New Zealand, I ordered it online from a local supplier.

I devoured it in about a day. When I read a particularly good book, I literally do not put it down unless I have to. Which usually means 'when I go to work'.

The story focuses on Jane Ellsworth. There is only one point, right at the beginning, where the story is not told from her perspective. It starts with her father musing over his daughters and their prospects for the future. Melody is beautiful, with 'a face made for fortune'. Jane, the older daughter, is very talented, but not as pretty as Melody, and so does not have any suitors. Thus we are given the first promise of the novel: it is about Jane finding love. A potential candidate is even mentioned in the first scene, though Jane is shown as being well aware of her father's match-making plans, and doesn't seem too interested in this particular young man.

Another promise is given almost casually. Jane is mentioned as having 'skill with glamour, music and painting... surpassed by none in their neighbourhood'. The promise, of course, is in the mention of 'glamour', which is the magic of this world. We are not told what it is. Yet. But, because it is a promise, we expect to know more soon. The mere mention of it is enough to tell us that this story has a little something more to it, something fantastical.

The next scene is the start of Jane's perspective. It moves almost immediately to a demonstration of glamour, and that Jane is far more skilled with it than her sister, Melody. Another promise, this one of potential tension. How does Melody feel about things, see things?

Because this is a good book, these promises are kept all the way through. All questions are answered. In fact, looking now at the beginning of the book, knowing where it goes and how it ends, I see other, subtle things pointed out that come back later. I won't say what they are. Read and find out.

'Shades of Milk and Honey'. An interesting title. A reference to 'the land of milk and honey', the proverbial paradise? There is a brief discourse on the nature of perfection and Paradise in the story. Also, glamour is the art of illusion, the creation of 'shades'. And I've seen a suggestion that 'milk and honey' refers to the difference between the two sisters, one sweet and fair, the other plain but pleasant.

It's also interesting to note that Jane has great talent with creating illusion through glamour, whereas Melody, it later becomes apparent, has her own ways of creating artifice.

Glamour itself is never really explained during the story, where it comes from or how it was discovered, what effect it has had on history. Which I feel to be a good thing, as there's no way to get that sort of information in without an infodump or a long discussion between two people who should know all about it already. Doing so would take a lot of immediacy away from the story. There's also no explanation as to how glamour is manipulated, exactly, but the basic description of it (pulling 'folds' from the 'ether', 'tying off knots', etc) suggests that it is simply manipulated by hand and will. That seems more than sufficient to me.

The dialogue and language seem fitting for the period and setting, though I'm hardly the best judge of such things. Suffice to say I found no anachronisms, and I have a tendency to notice odd little things because they throw me out of the story. I nitpick books and movies all the time, which annoys my girlfriend no end. Ahem. I found nothing to nitpick here, although the use of older spellings such as 'shewn' and 'chuse' did throw me a little, but no more than they would if seen in an historical document. If anything, it helped add a bit more verisimilitude.

The pace was excellent, there was never a scene that did not contribute in some way. Most scenes involved a party or social gathering, or someone making a social call. Whatever happened, however, there was always something that added to the story in some way. A little more information about something hinted at earlier, perhaps, or a hint of things to come. All leading up to a climax that lays bare the nature and character of those around. Denouement is then swift and clear, wrapping things up neatly.

Characterisation was constant, consistent, and when someone did something odd, it was noticed. There are definite archetypes, but nothing that felt stereotypical. Was I especially surprised by the way the story went? Well, not really, the revelations were fairly well sign-posted. But the handling of them was just fine, and the story did not suffer at all.

I should note that even such a good book can have a misleading blurb. The back copy on mine says 'But when her family's honor is threatened, she finds that she must push her skills to the limit in order to set things right - and, in the process, she accidentally wanders into a love story of her own'. True enough, but I find it a bit turned around. She was already wandering into her love story long before she had to leap into action to save her family's honor. In fact, that sort of trouble doesn't become completely apparent until well into the second half. This is not a book in which the overlooked sister rallies her talents in new and surprising ways to save her family's business or to unravel a mystery, or anything like that.

This is a book about Jane, about love, about the faces that we show and the things glamour of any kind can hide. It's about finding love in an unlikely place, and that appearances can be deceiving, if only because they do not tell the full story.

I can't think of anything more to say, except that I thoroughly enjoyed it.
LinkLeave a comment

A review [May. 14th, 2011|09:34 pm]
jacedraccus
So I just finished a trilogy. Sadly, I was not writing it. Happily, I was reading it. Well, those are the only two options, I guess, unless I decide to eat the books.

That won't happen.

I kind of wish I had written these books, but I know I never could. Anything we write, I think, is a reflection of ourselves, which ultimately means that all books, all stories, are unique, no matter how similar they may seem. Maybe I should stop this philosophical thing. I don't think I'm very good at it.

If our stories reflect ourselves, then these books have some dark things to say about Dan Wells, but also some things that are very... glorious. I think that's the word....

The books in question are 'I Am Not A Serial Killer', 'Mr Monster', and 'I Do Not Want To Kill You', all of which were written, as I said, by Dan Wells.

The overall story is about John Wayne Cleaver. At 16 years old, he believes himself to be a sociopath, and potentially a serial killer. He has the predictors, he's emotionally detached, he fantasizes about torturing others. Not surprisingly, he's obsessed with death and serial killers. Especially serial killers. Studying them, profiling them, is a hobby of his.

Let's get the obvious comparison out of the way. Dexter. Yes. Both stories involve a sociopath/serial killer, and both stories place that person in the unlikely role of 'hero', killing other killers. Both of them use a series of rules to help them interact with society. But, honestly, that's as far as the comparison goes.

For one thing, they are vastly different people. Dexter is quite happy as a killer. He embraces it. John, on the other hand, struggles with it. He fights against his urges with everything he has, but it's not easy. Sometimes he slips, falls... Both do try to do the right thing, but they do it in very different ways. But, of course, there's more.

Dexter comes to us fully formed. He IS a serial killer. He channels his murderous impulses into hunting down criminals, usually ones that the law cannot touch, has failed to catch. There is very little change in his character, very little evolution. He has crises and doubts, but the primary focus is generally the action, the hunt for a particular killer. Along the way he has to cope with personal relationships and misunderstandings, but primarily it's about the action and the whodunnit.

With John, however, the focus is the evolution of his character. He's not a killer yet. What choices will he make? What does he do? How does he cope? Like Dexter, the larger story is about John's hunt for a killer, but it's the questions about John that really drive the story. You're always asking yourself... will he hurt someone? Will he KILL someone?

Dexter's stories are primarily about what he does, while John's are about who he is.

That out of the way, the John Cleaver books are wonderfully written, tightly plotted and paced. Every scene contributes to John's hunt, or his personal growth, or both. The prose is direct, one might even say crisp. There is little ostentation or purple prose, and as the stories are written in first person perspective, they are very, very frank.

Often disturbingly so.

There are parts that will make you laugh, there are parts that will make you flinch, there are parts that will make you cringe. On several occasions I found myself staring at the page, not quite believing what had just happened. There are some quite horrific things in these books, but there's also a general optimism as well. Evil can be fought, we can rise above our baser natures. Triumphs can be had... but at great loss.

As I said, dark things, but glorious ones as well.

Hmmm, think I'm running out of things to say. Flaws? Very few, and nothing I felt was totally disruptive. Maybe a misplaced comma here or there, maybe a time or two where description didn't quite match what I remembered of a previous book. The latter is easily covered by the fact that a) it's maybe a month or more between reading the first and second books, and b) it may simply have been filling in details not previously mentioned.

Well, that's about it for now. I may edit if I come up with anything else to add. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed these books. The 2nd and 3rd books arrived on Thursday, and I finished them by Saturday evening. It would have been sooner, but I didn't take them to work. I can't trust myself taking such books to work.

I don't get any work done.

Anyways, I'll just conclude with the hope that I did better with the review than I did with the philosophy.
LinkLeave a comment

Sexuality in Gaming [Apr. 2nd, 2011|12:38 pm]
jacedraccus
Ok, started posting this on Twitter, but really, NOT a good idea to write an essay there. Very frustrating.

So. Apparently Dragon Age 2 allows the player to engage in romances with the companion characters. Neat. Some of those romances can be homosexual. Rock on.

Or... not. Because apparently there are straight people who feel that they aren't being catered to enough, and gay people who believe they aren't being catered to in the right way. Check out the links posted by Tycho of Penny Arcade: Here.

Not so long ago I read a forum post regarding World of Warcraft, complaining that there were no gay characters in WoW. I can't help but wonder if that person has played Dragon Age 2, and what they think of it.

As sexual politics get more and more varied and intense, as gay people fight to be recognised and treated as people, as everyone tries to find their own place in the world without feeling displaced by anyone else... shit like this happens. I don't mean having gay people wanting to feel represented in any kind of media. I'm cool with THAT. What I'm not cool with is ANY group bitching about it to no good end. Straight or gay, stop the whining, please.

Not enough. Too much. You're doing it wrong. It's not how I wanted it to be.

Here's an idea, MAKE YOUR OWN. Write a script how YOU want it. Make the game YOU want to see. Don't crucify some poor guy because he tried to include everyone. And if he did it wrong in your view, don't try to get him fired! That's just petty bullshit and doesn't reflect well on anyone involved. Seriously, this is supposed to represent the gay community in a better light?

Too many goddamn people with an axe to grind, I swear. It's all this 'customer is always right' bullshit. Nobody stops to check if they're even actually right anymore.

As for WoW, there's no ROOM for any kind of sexuality, really. It's a game about Horde vs Alliance vs Scourge vs Burning Legion vs Old Gods vs Deathwing vs I don't know what else. It's all action and questing. If you're not killing something for a quest, you're... well, no, pretty much all you do most of the time is kill things. Occasionally you rummage through poop.

There's no free-range interaction. Hell, your character is pretty much a blank slate. EVERYONE gets the same questing experience if they do the same quests. The NPCs don't stop and say "Oh hey, you're a night elf. I like night elves more than I like dwarves, so I'll treat you better than the dwarf I just talked to". If you want to get technical about it, the whole point of WoW's storyline is that YOU are the hero. The only hero. That's how the quests are designed, as if YOU are the only person who can, would, or could possibly do them. The MMO aspect is not reflected in quest dialog for the most part, except where it says things like, "you may need to get some friends to help you!".

But really, there's no room for having a romantic questline of any kind in WoW. And if they did, I can guarantee that someone will bitch about it endlessly, gay or straight.

Can we all just get off our high horses and play nice?
LinkLeave a comment

Maaaaybe I should use this thing more often..... [Feb. 6th, 2011|08:29 pm]
jacedraccus
Wow. Two years.

And I've barely made any progress on my story. If anything, I'm going backwards. Bah.

So. Since 2008. Still addicted to WoW. Mostly use this account to post on other accounts. I am employed, thankfully, but I wouldn't mind finding something else.

For those who don't know... and will likely be terribly shocked... I have a girlfriend now. Ciara. Met her in 2008. I really can't express how wonderful she is. We're very much alike but different at the same time. She's the one. She really is.

And that's about it...
LinkLeave a comment

1500 [Apr. 27th, 2008|07:12 pm]
jacedraccus
That's right, five times as good as 300.

Well, no, not really.

Actually, that's how many words I've written in my current story. Finally doing something to get the damn thing off the ground.

It's good to be writing again. Now to work on writing something that isn't crap.

YAY!
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Well, this is a surprise. [Mar. 18th, 2008|11:44 pm]
jacedraccus
bedroom toys
Powered By Vibrating Toy


Maybe a lack of experience is a good thing?

Though at that rate, there wouldn't be a lack for long...
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Back in NZ [Nov. 13th, 2007|02:30 pm]
jacedraccus
Well, I'm back home, with is ok and strange and confusing and... I don't know. Meh.

One major thing is that I'm disappointed I didn't get to meet Kippurbird like we'd discussed. Turns out that if I'd known then what I know now, about how limited net access would be before I left, and how easy it would be to go through LAX security, I could have made better plans, made the arrangements clear for both of us well ahead of time, and we'd have had a couple of hours to chat. Which would have been nice.

I would also have bought a cheap cellphone for use while in the States, so that I could communicate easier in such situations.

Next time. Definitely next time. Definitely, definitely next time.

Among all the other turbulence going through my head right now, there's a curious thought that has nothing to do with anything. And it is this:

Why, if smoking is such a hazard on airplanes, and there are smoke detectors in the bathrooms, and it's so forbidden and all... why are there ashtrays in the bathrooms? I'm told it's because smoking USED to be allowed... but it's still wierd.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

All good things... [Nov. 9th, 2007|12:32 pm]
jacedraccus
Well...

It sucks that my trip is almost over. My vacation is almost done. At 6am tomorrow morning, I will be flying out of Rochester for New York. Then to Los Angeles. Then to New Zealand.

My feelings are heavily mixed right now. I want to go home but I don't wanna leave, etc. I really don't want to stop hanging out with Harle and Andy (and I didn't want to stop hanging out with Ven, or D and Sharla), but at the same time, I do feel I put a bit of a burden on them, what with being a guest while they have two kids to look after already. Speaking of the kids, it's gonna be nice to be away from their 'bad' phases, but they're so freakin' adorable when they're good...

So yeah. Very torn right now.

So this is my last night out here. In about an hour and a half I will go offline, probably for good until I reach New Zealand. And thanks to the International Date Line, I might as well not exist on Sunday for most of the world...

Oh well. Guess it's over. Time to get on with my life. Whatever that's gonna be.

So long and thanks for all the fish.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]